THE MALAYSIAN BAR MARCH: NURUL IZZAH ANWAR’S MISSTEP TO THE LEFT
I feel compelled to comment on the action taken by Nurul Izzah Anwar (NIA), the Deputy President of the People’s Justice Party (PKR), who participated in the march organised by the Malaysian Bar yesterday. The march was held in response to allegations of interference in the appointment of the nation’s highest-ranking judges, an issue of serious concern that strikes at the very foundation of our democratic system: the independence of the judiciary.
However, NIA’s participation cannot be viewed in a vacuum or solely in her stated capacity as a “concerned citizen.” When one holds the second-highest position in the ruling party, every action carries political meaning, public perception, and strategic implications. It is no longer a personal gesture especially when she is also the daughter of PMX, who is at the centre of criticism regarding the very allegations being protested.
Her move has not only raised eyebrows among political observers but has also added to the confusion and disarray within her own party. If her participation was genuinely driven by concern for the integrity of the judiciary, a more effective and consistent approach would have been to use PKR’s internal mechanisms. As the Deputy President, NIA has both the standing and influence to raise the matter at the highest level, not merely to appear in a public march that ultimately clouds the party and government’s position on the issue.
It must also be noted that this act comes at a tense time when nine PKR leaders, including former Deputy President Rafizi Ramli, are under fire and facing calls for suspension for expressing the same concerns via a press conference and for urging the formation of a Royal Commission of Inquiry (RCI). This begs the question: is party discipline only enforced selectively? Are principles and positions judged based on who voices them, not what is being voiced?
What is more disappointing is NIA’s preference for proposing an independent tribunal instead of an RCI. This raises the perception that any investigation would remain at a technical and limited level, without addressing the broader systemic concerns including the possible role of the Prime Minister’s office. Her proposal seems to address the symptoms, not the root cause. It is ironic that someone who champions reform chooses a halfway measure when true reform is being demanded.
The rakyat are increasingly discerning when it comes to political manoeuvres. They are no longer impressed by hollow symbolism but demand consistency in conviction and courage without bias. Participating in a protest is not inherently wrong but when it is done by a top leader in the ruling party, and especially when it touches directly on her own father’s position, it inevitably raises questions about political sincerity and transparency of intent.
This was a misstep to the left by Nurul Izzah; one that may come at a cost.
Khairul Faizi bin Ahmad Kamil
15 July 2025
Jalan Raja Laut, Kuala Lumpur
Ulasan
Catat Ulasan